Download Verbal Ability Questions
Verbal Ability Questions- Direction for next 2 Verbal Ability Questions questions: Read the argument and answer the Verbal Ability Questions that follows.
1. When I go on a picnic, I am reminded of studies. Since I have not gone on a picnic, I am not reminded of studies.
Which of these is logically most similar to the above argument?
a. When Ram paints, he feels like going to meet everyone. Since Ram has not painted, he does not feel like going to meet anyone.
b. When Ram goes on a picnic, he feels like studying. He does not feel like going on a picnic because he has not studied.
c. When Ram does not study, he does not feel like going on a picnic. Since he has felt like going on a picnic, he must have studied.
d. My mother threatens to leave the house when I don’t study for CAT. If I do not crack CAT, she will leave me.
2. When the Director of Mines Safety visited the Sukinda mines, many of the newly recruited miners complained about the noise pollution. When the Director took up this issue with the management of the Sukinda mines, it was explained to him that the newly recruited workers were not used to the harsh working conditions and were feeling uncomfortable because they had not been exposed to difficult living. They gave as evidence the fact that most of the employees who had worked for 10 years or more made no complaints.
What, if true, would make the evidence that the management gave to the Director of Mines Safety highly questionable?
a. Though most of the long-serving employees did not complain, some did protest against the low wages.
b. The long-serving employees did not complain because the noise pollution had led to hearing loss.
c. The long-serving workers were at the mercy of the management because they had taken loans.
d. The miners were not familiar with standard English usage.
Related posts:


November 30th, 2009 at 3:05 am
1.a
2.b
November 30th, 2009 at 3:05 am
2 c)
November 30th, 2009 at 3:07 am
1.a, 2.b
November 30th, 2009 at 3:08 am
1. a
2. b
November 30th, 2009 at 3:32 am
1a
2c
November 30th, 2009 at 3:44 am
1-a
2-b
November 30th, 2009 at 5:25 am
a
b
November 30th, 2009 at 9:20 pm
1.a.
2.b
November 30th, 2009 at 11:18 pm
1. a
The argument has the structure: When X, then Y. Since not X, then not Y. (a) has a similar argument.
2. b
(b) offers critical evidence that can question the explanation given by the management of Sukinda mines. (a), (c) and (d) go beyond the scope of the argument
December 2nd, 2009 at 6:19 pm
1.(a) whenever he started any work at the same time he suppose to do any other work.
2.(b) they(old employees) are just propitious of noise.
December 21st, 2009 at 1:31 am
Very extraordinary site.
The information here is truly important.
I will refer it to my friends.
Cheers