Data Interpretation Questions with Solutions

data-interpretation-questions-with-solutions.

Direction for next 5 Data Interpretation Questions: Answer the data interpretation questions based on the following table.

Following table shows the scores of students in 8 MOCK CAT (section wise). Assume all MOCK CAT contain 3 sections, each sections have 50 questions. The total of the scores in 3 sections is compared with “cut off” and if his total score is higher than the “cut off”, it is said that he has cleared the “cut off”.

	English	Quant	D.I.	Cut-off
MOCK 1	23	12	19	56
MOCK 2	24	17	18	62
MOCK 3	29	11	23	60
MOCK 4	21	14	21	57
MOCK 5	19	13	25	59
MOCK 6	26	17	21	60
MOCK 7	25	19	23	58
MOCK 8	27	20	21	65

1. In how many MOCK CATs did he clear the cut off?

a. 2

b. 3

c. 4

d. 5

2. In which MOCK CAT did he score the maximum total marks?

a. 3^rd

b. 6^th

c. 7^th

d. 8^th

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: 2009 Data Interpretation Questions, 2010 Data Interpretation Questions, cat 2010 Data Interpretation Questions, CAT Data Interpretation Questions, Data Interpretation questions, Data Interpretation Questions 2009, Data Interpretation Questions 2010, Data Interpretation Questions for cat, Data Interpretation Questions with answers, Data Interpretation Questions with solutions, previous year Data Interpretation Questions, Sample data interpretation questions

Data Interpretation Questions

Data Interpretation Questions And Answers.

Directions for next 5 Data Interpretation Questions: Answer the Data Interpretation questions based on the following graph:

1. Which year has showed the greatest percentage increase in profit as compared to the previous year?

a. 1993

b. 1994

c. 1990

d. 1992

2. The average revenue collected in the given seven years is approximately:

a. Rs. 164 lakh

b. Rs. 168 lakh

c. Rs. 171 lakh

d. Rs. 175 lakh

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: 2009 Data Interpretation Questions, 2010 Data Interpretation Questions, CAT Data Interpretation Questions, Data Interpretation, Data Interpretation questions, Data Interpretation Questions and answer, Data Interpretation Questions cat, Data Interpretation Questions for cat, Data Interpretation Questions with answers, Data Interpretation Questions with solutions

Data Interpretation Questions With Answers

Data Interpretation Questions With Answers: Direction for next 4 Data Interpretation Questions: Answer the data interpretation questions based on the following information:

The year is 2089. Beijing, London, New York and Paris are in contention to host the 2096 Olympics. The eventual winner is determined through several rounds of voting by members of the IOC with each member representing a different city. All the four cities in contention are also represented in IOC.

In any round of voting the city receiving the lowest number of votes in that round gets eliminated. The survivor after the last round of voting gets to host the event.

A member is allowed to cast votes for at most two different cities in all rounds of voting combined. (Hence, a member becomes ineligible cast a vote in a given round if vote the city (s) he votes for in earlier rounds are out of contention in that round of voting).

A member is also ineligible to cast a vote, in round if the city (s) he represents is in contention in that round of voting.

As long as the member is eligible, (s) he must vote and vote for only one candidate city in any round of voting.

The following incomplete table shows the information on cities that received the maximum and minimum votes in different, the number of votes cast in their favor and the total votes that were cast in those rounds.

Round	Total Votes cast	Maximum votes cast		Eliminated
		City	No. of votes	City	No. of votes
1		London	30	New York	12
2	83	Paris	32	Beijing	21
3	75

It is also known that

All those who voted for London and Paris in round 1, continued to vote for the same cities in subsequent rounds as long as these cities were in contention. 75% of those who voted for Beijing in round 1, voted for Beijing in round 2 as well.

• Those who voted for New York in round 1, voted either for Beijing or Paris in round 2.
• The difference in votes cast for the two contending cities in the last round was 1.
• 50% of those who voted for Beijing in round 1, voted for Paris in round 3.

1. What is the number of votes cast for Paris in round 1?
a. 16
b. 18
c. 22
d. 24

2. What percentage of members from among those who voted for Beijing in round 2 and were eligible in vote in round 3, voted for London?
a. 33.33
b. 38.10
c. 50
d. 66.67

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: CAT Data Interpretation Questions and answer, Data Interpretation questions and solutions, Data Interpretation Questions with answers, Data Interpretation Questions with solutions